Center for Local and Regional Governance

  • Home
  • Courses
    • Local Legislative Program >
      • iExceLL Introductory Course on Excellence in Local Legislation
      • Development Legislation Enhancement Course
      • Legis Team
    • Executive Education >
      • iLEAD - Introducting Local Executives to Administration and Development
      • Prepare U
    • Customized Training >
      • Customized Online Courses
      • Thematic Courses
    • Professional Development Program >
      • HR Inspire
      • Courses for the Youth >
        • iProcure Home >
          • Research by Topic >
            • Agriculture Research
            • Capacity Development Research
            • Comparative Local Government Research
            • Decentralization Research
            • Health Research
            • Local Finance and Management Research
            • Local Leadership Research
            • Participatory Governance Research
            • Resources
            • Program Administration Research
            • Urban Governance Research
            • Transparency and Accountability Research >
              • Systems Improvement Research
      • RegFin
    • Youth in Local Governance Program >
      • Youth Participation in Local Governance
  • Who We Are
    • In House Experts
    • Initiatives >
      • Policy Briefs and Reviews
    • The Director
    • Administration
    • CLRG Advantage >
      • Archive CLRG News
      • Timeline
    • Affiliate Faculty
    • Affiliate Experts
  • Research
  • Consulting
  • Alumni
  • Partners
  • Latest CLRG News
  • Citizen's Charter
RESEARCH

Overview
Completed
Browse by Topic

Is Our Katarungang Pambarangay Still Relevant?
Two Case Studies on Our Indigenous Filipino Justice System

The Katarungang Pambarangay may be considered as the poor man’s avenue for speedy justice, though there are limits to cases it can hear. Previous studies have established their value in unclogging the courts of cases which otherwise would have been brought to their attention. This can of course be translated in terms of savings for the government. In spite of that, society barely appreciates the existence of the Katarungang Pambarangay. Relevant studies on this subject are scant but it maybe of merit to raise the public’s interest and include this in the public administration discourse.

The research is composed of two (2) cases – one urban barangay and one rural barangay. The two barangays will be selected from among the winners/national finalists of the 2011 Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards.


Specifically, the study would look into the:

  • relevance of the Katarungang Pambarangay in terms of the types of cases, results/performance, clarity of system, and profile of parties involved in the cases;
  • capacity building requirements of Lupon members in terms of questions on the KP system and technicalities, records system, profile and selection of Lupon members, and other capacity building needs they may have;
  • success factors versus aspects that may have led to failed reconciliation efforts;
  • legitimacy of the Katarungang Pambarangay in terms of the awareness and knowledge of the residents about KP as well as their trust and satisfaction levels, as applicable; and
  • difference in the nature of cases, profile of members and success factors in a rural versus urban barangay, if there are.

>Back to list of research topics or check our on-going studies.
©2015-2021  Center for Local and Regional Governance | UP Diliman 1101 Quezon City, Philippines  |   Webpage Feedback